Browse Books:
- BY CATEGORY
- BY ISSUE
- SEARCH BOOKS:
Questions?
Contact PBC Customer Service at 1-800 682-1825 or use our contact form.
Get this book for FREE (plus S&H) when you join PBC
A Jury of Her Peers
American Women Writers from Anne Bradstreet to Annie Proulxby Elaine Showalter
2 Reviews
Publisher: Knopf
Publish Date:Feb 24, 2009
Hardcover, 608 pages
List Price:$30.00
Member Price:$24.00
You Pay: $0.00
You Save: $30.00
Counts as 1 selection.
Availability: Ready to Ship
|
|
|||
Summary |
An unprecedented literary landmark: a brilliantly authoritative history of American women writers from 1650 to 2000.
In a narrative of immense scope and fascination, groundbreaking feminist scholar Elaine Showalter (A Literature of Their Own) introduces readers to more than 250 female writers. These include not only famous and expected names (Harriet Beecher Stowe, Willa Cather, Dorothy Parker, Flannery O’Connor, Gwendolyn Brooks, Grace Paley, and Toni Morrison, among them), but also many who were once successful and acclaimed yet now are little known, from the early American best-selling novelist Catherine Sedgwick to the Pulitzer Prize–winning playwright Susan Glaspell.
Showalter arranges her material chronologically in twenty chapters and supplies biographical details and an assessment of the writers' work. With characteristic wit, verve, and authority she shows how these women—both the enduring stars and those left behind by the canon—were connected to one another and to their times. She believes it is high time to fully integrate the contributions of women into our American literary heritage, and she undertakes the task with brilliance and flair, making the case for the unfairly overlooked and putting the overrated firmly in their place.
Whether or not readers agree with the book’s roster of writers, A Jury of Her Peers is an irresistible invitation to join the debate, to discover long-lost great writers, and to return to familiar titles with a deeper appreciation. It is a monumental work that will greatly enrich our understanding of American literary history and culture.
Praise for A Jury of Her Peers
“[A] remarkable book. . . . [Showalter’s] approach . . . is unifying and magnanimous. She brings a perspective to changing literary culture that makes criticism seem not only understandable but also healthy and invigorating, making the work timeless in its ability to weather readers’ changing priorities. . . . A Jury of Her Peers does an enormous service, houses a drop-dead reading list and gives the reader a fluid framework for the great (much of it still undiscovered) wealth of writing by women in this country.”
—Susan Salter Reynolds, Los Angeles Times
“Only Elaine Showalter, our foremost feminist critic, could give us this extraordinary and endlessly intriguing book. It is at once magisterial and delicate, comprehensive and richly detailed, critically acute yet generous. She tells stories of art being made from—and sometimes in spite of—love, marriage, loneliness, housework, politics, motherhood, and hardship. Yet always the writing itself is at the center, as Showalter stakes out the tradition’s common ground and illuminates its most startling and stunning creations.”
—Christine Stansell, author of American Moderns: New York Bohemia and the Creation of a New Century
“A Jury of Her Peers is a work of astonishing vision, breadth, intelligence, and audacity. Elaine Showalter, long recognized as our preeminent feminist scholar-critic, whose prose shimmers with wickedly funny asides, has produced the most ambitious and brilliantly executed book of her career, one that is sure to be required reading for all who have an interest in American literary history.”
—Joyce Carol Oates
“A breathtaking overview of the intersections of gender and genre in American letters. . . . With its frank assessments, impressive research and expansive scope, A Jury of Her Peers belongs on the shelf of any reader interested in the development of women’s writing in America.”
—Jennifer Cognard-Black, Ms. Magazine
“Elaine Showalter’s case for nearly four centuries of American women’s writing unfolds in a narrative as gripping as a favorite novel. Smartly paced and peppered with choice anecdotes and telling excerpts, A Jury of Her Peers shows vast knowledge and keen insight delivered with grace and verve. Readers will delight in the discovery of new writers and fresh encounters with familiar figures as Showalter once again proves to be the leading feminist literary authority of our time.”
—Cecelia Tichi, William R. Kenan Jr. Professor of English at Vanderbilt University
"Elaine Showalter brings American women writers to life in this immensely readable and illuminating literary history from the Puritans to the present. A rare combination of vivid writing, brilliant analysis and scholarly substance—engaging from beginning to end."
—Wendy Martin, author of An American Triptych: Anne Bradstreet, Emily Dickinson, and Adrienne Rich and editor of We Are the Stories We Tell
Learn More |
Back to top |
|
Excerpt: A Jury of Her Peers I A New Literature Springs Up in the New World From the very beginning, women were creating the new words of the New World. The first women writers in America, Anne Bradstreet (1612–1672) and Mary Rowlandson (1637–1711), were born in England and endured the harrowing three-month voyage of storm, seasickness, and starvation across the North Atlantic. In Massachusetts, where they settled, they led lives of extraordinary danger and deprivation. Both married and had children; they thought of themselves primarily as good wives and mothers. Both made the glory of God their justification for writing, but they prefigured themes and concerns that would preoccupy American women writers for the next 150 years and more—Bradstreet, the poet, writing about the intimacies and agonies of domestic life, including pregnancy and maternity, the death of three of her grandchildren, and the destruction of her home by fire; and Rowlandson, writing a narrative of her captivity by Narragansett Indians, and pioneering the great American theme of interracial experience in the encounter with Native American culture. Both Bradstreet and Rowlandson entered print shielded by the authorization, legitimization, and testimony of men. In Bradstreet’s case, no fewer than eleven men wrote testimonials and poems praising her piety and industry, prefatory materials almost as long as the thirteen poems in the book. In his introductory letter, John Woodbridge, her brother-in-law, stood guarantee that Bradstreet herself had written the poems, that she had not initiated their publication, and that she had neglected no housekeeping chore in their making: “these Poems are the fruit but of some few houres, curtailed from her sleep and other refreshments.” Rowlandson’s narrative too came with “a preface to the reader” signed “Per Amicum” (“By a Friend”), probably the minister Increase Mather, which explained that although the work had been “penned by this Gen ... continue reading > |
|
A Jury of Her Peers: A Weeklong Discussion This week at Progressive Book Club, we're honored to host a discussion between Elaine Showalter and Erica Jong. Showalter is a professor emerita at Princeton University and the author A Jury of Her Peers: American Women Writers From Anne Bradstreet to Annie Proulx and numerous other works, including the groundbreaking A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Erica Jong--novelist, poet, and essayist--has published 20 books and is the recipient of many awards. She is a member of the Progressive Book Club editorial board. In the coming days they'll be discussing A Jury of Her Peers and, more broadly, the place of women in the American literary tradition. (Note that the posts appear in reverse-chronological order, so that the most recent dispatch is at the top.) From: Erica Jong To: Elaine Showalter Date: Friday, March 20, 2009 Dear Elaine-- You raise an interesting point: media snarkiness and academic backwardness trail way behind readers' acceptance. I have always found readers far more open than critics. Readers are very open to the expansion of women's writing. They are less concerned with niggling about genres. They understand that fiction and memoir have come ever closer in our time. Do you have any idea why this split between readers and critics occurs? Is it just further proof of the old Chinese proverb "Those in the free seats hiss first"? Or is it because readers want a real experience and critics are more concerned with proving literary theories? I'm so glad you are having the invaluable experience of connecting with readers. I've often wished that publishers could come with me and listen to what the readers say. The make the whole process of writin ... continue reading > |



Favorites
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Facebook
Reddit
Live
Yahoo
Furl
StumbleUpon 





In 1977, you published A Literature of Their Own about British women writers, and now comes A Jury of Her Peers, the American counterpart. Why did you decide to write this book more than 30 years after that first volume?
In A Literature of Their Own, I covered about 150 years of work by women novelists in England. I always wanted to write a literary history of American women writers, but that was a much larger task—a time span of more than 350 years, an enormous country, and a much more racially, regionally, and ethnically diverse group of authors, especially since I also wanted to include poetry and drama. So I needed a long, clear stretch of time to read, research, visit archives, ponder, and write. That time and freedom was never available while I was raising my family and completely involved and immersed in university teaching. The beginning of the 21st century seemed like the right moment for the book, and maybe the last chance for me, and in 2003, I made the decision to take early retirement from Princeton and devote myself entirely to this study of the American literary tradition.
Tell us about the process and criteria for selecting the more than 250 writers introduced in A Jury of Her Peers.
.gif)